Showing posts with label whackadoodles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label whackadoodles. Show all posts

Take Two STFU and Call Me In the Morning

Here's an interesting note I ran across this morning. It seems physicians are starting to get their little feelings hurt by people who comment about them on rate-my-MD-type websites. To the extent that some of them are starting to ask their patients to sign agreements promising not to make any such comments on the interwebs "without prior consent."

Some doctors advocate an aggressive response. Retired neurosurgeon Jeffrey Segal of Greensboro, N.C., is the founder of Medical Justice, a company that for a fee starting at $495 provides sample privacy agreements and monitors online comments for its 2,000 members. He said the agreements enable doctors to ask Web sites to remove comments by patients who have signed privacy agreements, and to take legal action against patients.

I smell a lawyer somewhere!

Are you seriously going to refuse treatment to a patient if they won't agree to a gag order? Isn't that kiiiinda in conflict with the Hippocratic Oath?

Look, I totally get the argument that there are a handful of whackos out there who will set their sights on someone for arbitrary reasons and try to "ruin" them by making whackadoodle comments all over the internets. And I understand that doctors are somewhat hamstrung in their ability to respond because of doctor-patient confidentiality (indeed, a doctor may not even be able to acknowledge whether a particular individual was or was not his patient due to confidentiality concerns). But c'mon. Trying to control what people say about you on the web is an abjectly worthless endeavor.

First of all, in addition to violating the Hippocratic Oath, the kind of confidentiality agreements some doctors want to require are probably unenforceable. Particularly in regards to patients seeking primary or emergency care. A court would look at the imbalance in bargaining power in those conditions and determine that the gag "order" was unconscionable, or signed under duress. Doctors specializing in more elective type of medicine - dermatologists, plastic surgeons - might have a better chance of getting away with it. But do we really want some doctors to be above reproach and others not?

Secondly, you're crazy if you think you can silence someone who has an agenda (rational or not) against you - unless and until that person runs afoul of civil or ciminal law in what they're saying about you. Your typical web-based whackadoodle is savvy enough to know how to mask her identity. And finally, people with valid complaints have a right to air their grievances.

Eventually, the general public will also become internet savvy enough to see through most of the frivolous complaints. If someone anonymously posts that a health professional committed a grievous act or omission, the same complaint should appear in that doctor's publicly-available record with the medical board in the state where that doctor practices. Doctor-ratings websites could also step up to the plate and monitor those kind of allegations, looking for corroboration in medical board records. If you have truly been mistreated by a health professional and you want to take action to make sure it doesn't happen again, you should take your case to the authorities rather than just making an ass of yourself on the internet. Same goes for the conditions of your doctor's office - it it's dirty to the point of being unsanitary, you should file an official complaint. When you choose only to go the anonymous web route, people should be very suspicious of what you have to say. And I think that, eventually, most folks will figure that out. Similarly, the general public will eventually recognize the phenomenon of "nutburger with an axe to grind and an unmonitored platform on which to grind it" and will scrutinize anonymous comments accordingly.

Yes, it's going to take a while. And in the mean time I'm sure it's a bitter pill for your doctor to swallow (bah dum pum!). But society will catch up. Until then, if a doctor asks you to promise to keep your mouth shut, refuse to sign the agreement and REPORT REPORT REPORT (to the medical board) any doctor who won't give you treatment for your refusal to do so.

Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!

Sarah Palin resigns as Governor of Alaska - but is it really a surprise to anyone that this woman

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


is not a serious politician? I mean, come on - all Sarah has ever wanted is her cute little mug to be featured in HD on 72-inch plasmas all over the good ol' US of A. She's a shallow airhead who wants to be a celebutante, and now that she's got her chance? You betcha she's done playin' Governor of Alaska! Darn tootin'.

Can you believe this woman was nearly a heartbeat away from the Presidency? We'll be seeing her on Fox News following Huckabee in 5,4,3,2...

Hat tip: CNN

Jane Velez-Mitchell: A Poor Man's Nancy Grace

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

I don't really enjoy Jane's show - she is even more shrieky and sensational than Nancy (I know it's hard to believe). She doesn't even do macabre, tacky montages of dead babies with creepy theme music by Michael Jackson. So why do I watch Jane's show? For one reason, of course...

THAT MULLET!!!!!

What the fuck is going on there? And who on god's green earth told her that was a good look? The only person with a worse mullet than Jane was:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

But even Phil Spector has moved on to a more respectable coif, thanks to the fact that they don't allow rugs in prison:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Maybe Jane murdered one of the babies that Nancy features on her show, and then she too can be liberated from her tragic mullet.

Somebunny's Going to Emergency, Somebunny's Going to Jail

Photobucket

Looks like some whackadoodle in Oregon can't help herself when it comes to rabbits. Poor Miriam Sakewitz keeps getting caught with a bunch of live, and a bunch of dead, bunnies.

Problems for Sakewitz started in October 2006 when police in Hillsboro, about 15 miles west of Portland, found and confiscated nearly 250 rabbits in her home, including about 100 dead ones in freezers and refrigerators.

Police said she broke into the facility where the survivors were being cared for in January 2007 and stole most of them back. Authorities found her a few days later in Chehalis, Wash., with eight live rabbits and two dead ones in her car. Another 130 rabbits were recovered at a nearby horse farm.

Sakewitz was sentenced in April 2007 to five years probation and was banned from owning or controlling animals. She also was told not to go within 100 yards of a rabbit.

She got a Bunny Rabbit TRO???

Well, as I'm sure you've guessed by now, Miriam violated the terms of her probation and

On Tuesday, Washington County animal control officers removed eight adult rabbits, five young ones and a dead one from Sakewitz's hotel room, Tigard police spokesman Jim Wolf said.

Why has she always gotta have at least one dead one on her?


Photobucket



Lady, step away from the bunnies. Get yourself a cat. On second thought - don't.